[ BACK TO TABLE OF CONTENTS ]
The Anti-Communitarian League: Grassroots Research & Analysis of the Ultimate Third Way
The Balance of Man, Part One: The Emperor's New Dialect
by Niki Friedrich Raapana
January 4, 2003
What's the biggest lie ever told? The biggest lie in the history of the modern world is the theory of communism. Why? Because their very premise is that logic no longer exists.
According to the theorists who created the new political ideology, man advanced past the limiting restrictions for formal argument and debate, and he threw away the rules for logic.
Truth was replaced by their big lie in 1848. Their big lie about capitalism was based on a whole new British "scientific philosophy" designed purposefully to destroy logic. It was created by the Imperialists to stop the impossible debate against the too logical Americans.
The British could never win an argument against our republicans. The American truth was always too simple and direct. It's why the British aristocracy calls US Americans "vulgar." We were too bloody logical, and our founder's most reasonable and logical arguments beat the imperialist's rapist, Free-Trade policies in the court of American public opinion.
The United States of America is entirely founded on reason and logic. (1) Our US founders were clear, precise, and simply too logical in their premises and their conclusions. Their easily understood argument can be summarized as this: A- there is obviously a natural law to the universe, B- man is obviously naturally a part of the universe, therefore C- man's natural state is to live under the natural laws of the universe.
This is how our founders arrived at the masterful conclusion that "all men are created equal." This is how they arrived at the conclusion, "government derives its just powers from the consent of the governed." This is the logic they used to write the Bill of Rights.
Imperialists could never successfully argue against the FACTS of the American argument. So they set about destroying the very foundation for the American's logical, free system.
Communism was designed to ELIMINATE logic from the world of reasonable men, and the big lie is that the entire world must bow down before a dumb theory of NO-REASON.
Henry D. Aiken, Professor of Philosophy at Harvard explains the communists' theory of no-reason in his Introduction to the Age of Ideology commentary, (2)
"...Beginning with Kant, the very conception of the philosophical enterprise that had prevailed since the time of Aristotle underwent a profound sea-change, with the consequence that the meanings of even such basic terms of the traditional philosophical vocabulary as 'metaphysics' and 'logic' were altered beyond recognition... Much of the obscurity that pervades nineteenth-century philosophical writing is directly related to this fact." (3)
The communist lie says the American's logical system of government robs humanity of its natural existence. The big lie says the united American "union" of free and independent states cannot compare to the communist-socialist ideology of no-reason. The big lie explains why they can claim that only united peasant, "union" workers, living under their totalitarian, global government can achieve true individual, human happiness. (4)
The big lie says the United States of America represents Imperialist colonial subjugation policies perfected by the global Empires. The big lie says American's individual liberty is best represented by international corporate (Imperial) capitalist policies. The BIG lie is that the Bill of Rights was designed to impose the American "will" on ANY other nation.
The biggest and most horrible lie ever told, in the history of humankind, is Marx's theory of communism. The lie says it appeared in "opposition" to capitalism, it arose from man's inherent need for natural evolution into a more advanced civil society. The frank truth is: the "theory of communism" was introduced by the British Empire to stop the American economic system from taking hold in Germany, or anywhere else in the world.(5)
The big, twisted lie is not the American truth. It's never been our truth. But, the lie is on everyone's lips, and no one is allowed to speak the truth about the British or the Zionists ever again. Breaking the gag order against reason and logic is a hate crime. Reasonable attempts to discuss the theory of NO-reason are unpatriotic, and practically terrorist acts.
In the good old days, to be a "good" American meant the Brits didn't like you. US patriots argued brilliantly against imperial monarchists. Our founders left us scathingly brutal, logical discourses on the absolute absurdity of the monarchist's position. American patriots were openly defiant in the fat faces of Imperial authority. It was a code of honor in the new Republic to scorn British hereditary titles and ranks. Thomas Paine made American history resound with his outflanking of British scholars with his masterful sense of fun. How did we Americans forget the one thing that identified a "well-bred" Yank?
Well, after 150 years of pure drivel, we fell for the big lie. We were so busy building a free country that we didn't notice how pervasive the lie had become. We fell for Engel's new idea for a more "civil society," and we allowed Marxism to replace reasoned debate with a more "moral dialogue." (6) We allowed them to slip into our country to teach us and our children their "new" politically correct speech (a confusing and often "illogical" ideology).
Now, after 150 years of "constant conflict," the American founder's pure logic has been replaced with the Hegelian dialectical synthesis. Ever heard of that? I took a class in logic and critical thinking at CSUC in 1982. I do remember wondering several times why logic wasn't required prior to graduating from high school... but I really don't remember the Hegelian dialectic "theory" being stressed as REALLY important to ALL Americans. (7)
I was never taught how Marx used Hegel's attack on logic to create the opposite "flow" called communism, nor that the "solution" was the Third Way, called communitarianism. I just wasn't taught how painstakingly the global elite, "social scientists" designed it.
Communism was manufactured to overcome world-wide individual and national freedom.
Communism was created to "balance" the global Imperialist's incredible losses. The whole "ideology" (and the term ideology itself) was a counter-attack against the reasonable (and working) free American economic system of protected property and trade rights. How is it possible that most Americans are only taught the communist-socialist "party line?" (7a)
I didn't know that Friedrich Engels was a such sly devil. Nobody told me that he was a wealthy German-born, British-bred, aristocratic-elitist, Little Manchester factory owner who wrote all the original drafts; Marx only modified them. Engels wrote everything first. For some dumb reason I thought they were collaborators. But I don't feel that stupid anymore. It's never emphasized that Engels was a rich man who spoon fed the no-reason ideology to the poor, suffering Marx, who was hired to write the imperialist manifesto with proper revolutionary lingo. Is it an important historical fact for Americans to know that two or three (the reported #'s vary) of Karl Marx's children died from malnutrition while he was working for Friedrich Engels? (8)
Engels and his wealthy cronies in British manufacturing used Karl Marx to muddy up the difference between Imperialist "rapist" economics and the logical American's idea of protecting national trade, a style of "capitalism." As Aiken explains, "It is capitalism, according to Marx, and not the love of power, which breeds imperialism and war." (9) Yet the United States of America was not engaging ANYBODY in imperialism and war, that was what the imperialists were doing. The American founders insited the only way to survive as a free country was to stay out of foreign internal affairs. The American sytem was free enterprise, NOT imperialist "free trade".
The "new" American system spurred ENORMOUS successes in small business, agriculture, industry and manufacturing. The US promotion of new business ventures and protected copyrights and patents prompted amazing and wonderful inventions, and everything was further protected under strong national tariffs. American success was easily understood by every nation in the world suffering under British Imperialist's "free trade" policies. (10)
The Imperialists hated Americans. Their scholars could not give up their love for fallacious reasoning even after we beat the pants off them TWICE. Their constant and frequent ad hominum attacks against the American "character" were banal. In 1841, Friedrich Engels, (lover of mankind) wrote: "It is the German (emigrants) in the cities who have taught the Americans their deplorable contempt for our nation. The German merchant makes a point of honor to discard his Germanness and become a complete Yankee ape... When he returns to Germany he acts the Yankee more than ever." [boldface mine] (11)
The British Imperialists with global "interests" had failed to defeat the vulgar Yanks again in the War of 1812. The British were looking for new ways to stop the mad Yankee virus based on the logical rights of individual freedom. It was most definitely spreading. (12)
By 1834, things had become really ugly out there. Those horrible German republicans were under the tutelage of German-American economist-philosopher Friedrich List (1830 US Counsel to France and three German cities). With List, they had successfully "created a national union of German manufacturing interests by lowering tariffs between principalities and erecting tariff barriers against the British dumping of cheap exports." (13)
From our very inception (as the first colonial people in the history of British Imperialist rule to use LOGIC to declare ourselves free men), we were committed to honor the right of all people, everywhere in the world, to declare themselves free from imperialist rulers. The American "promotion" and exporting of "freedom" was not performed in the tradition of Imperialists who use guns and violence to "convince" people to adopt Free Trade. Our founders explained the unreasonableness of Free Trade as practiced by the Imperialists. (14)
We did NOT plan to go around the world "freeing" people. We just honored individual liberty for all mankind. We merely respected the rights of all men to declare themselves free from foreigners who mess up local production and trade. It was THAT simple.
The Imperialists' new problems began when the U.S. founders further removed their country from the European Free Trade Wars, and then promised the rest of the Western Hemisphere that they recognized everyone's sovereign, NATIONAL rights to self-determination. In 1821, all the Spanish colonies in Latin America Declared their Independence from Spain, and they "borrowed" their "right" to do it on the American's format. The imperialists wanted assurances from the U.S., but the U.S. gave their assurances to the national sovereignity of legitimate nations.
In 1823 Patriot U.S. President James Monroe told the Imperialist world, "Our policy in regard to Europe, which was adopted at an early stage of the wars which have so long agitated that quarter of the globe, nevertheless remains the same, which is, not to interfere in the internal concerns of any of its powers." (15)
We were an isolationist country for reasons of self-preservation. Wars devastate and destroy entire nations and civilizations. The Americans wanted to survive and trade as free men, from a free country. Monroe's speech to the U.S. Congress explains the simple US foreign policy, and the U.S. American's only legitimate reason for engaging in war.
Our US President not only refused to make pacts with Great Britain and Russia to commit American troops to meddle in the affairs of Spain, Portugal or (anyone's "rebellious" colonies), but the U.S. policy was to carefully recognize new governments who overthrew the imperialists. He vowed the U.S. only makes war when, "...our rights are invaded or seriously menaced." (16) (Notice Monroe did NOT say "interests;" he said "rights.")
President Monroe explained the difference between free U.S. foreign policy and European imperialists' "... the defense of our own, which has been achieved by the loss of so much blood and treasure, and matured by the wisdom of their most enlightened citizens, and under which we have enjoyed unexampled felicity, this whole nation is devoted." (17)
It didn't phase my dad one bit when President Reagan called the Somozan National Guardsmen planning a counter-coup against the Sandinistas, "freedom fighters," and my dad and I had our last "good" family political discussion back in 1984. I did an independent study in government research at UMass under Howard Ziff, and had just produced a documentary about American economic policy in Central America.
In spite of our national involvement in genocidal maniac wars, in bizarre wars that make absolutely NO sense to a reasonable American (raised to understand the founding logic for our isolationist policy), my father, and many other foolish "patriots" like him, persist in believing the LIE. My dad thinks that the CIA interventionist "policies" designed to undermine foreign "leftist" nationalist governments are actually dedicated to furthering the original (and reasonable) American system of supporting legitimate nationalists! (18)
Now, in 2003, after all the new laws and programs passed since the 9-11 massacres, my father continues to believe it. He still believes that his beloved 82nd Airborne (and the current US government) are still the representatives of "freedom and justice for all." The current US foreign policy is so far removed from what Hamilton, Washington, JQ Adams, Monroe, McKinley, Clay and Lincoln had in mind, it's hard to imagine how my dad and the rest of our new well-trained military elites are able to justify their "new" beliefs.
In what does my father actually "believe" in? Freedom? Justice? What part of the War on Terror exemplifies American ideas of freedom or justice? Does the military activity at Guantanamo Bay represent justice to him? Is stealing oil a justifiable reason for war?
What part of the USA Patriot Act would our 1787 Continental Congress pass? Our founding fathers were extremely familiar with terrorism. They knew what the British terrorist soldiers did to Americans and what the British-trained Indians were doing to the American and Canadian settlements on the north and western borders. Americans hated the British for their inhumane and bloody tactics against civilians. The Americans WROTE the Bill of Rights in RESPONSE to British terrorism. They most certainly didn't create a British styled totalitarian police state to "protect American's safety."
Do my dad and his buddies in the 82nd know what part of the 2002 Homeland Security Act was designed by the British-Fabian-Zionist "Senior Advisor" in the White House since 1976? (19) Lucky for the lie that the Americans don't pay any attention to the loyalties of the people who surround their presidents. Americans simply aren't aware that they have "special" advisors who use No-Reason to justify their total dishonoring of every American patriot, soldier, and politician who ever fought for the American free way of life.
Thanks to the success of the lie, we can all be certain to get more than "ample" proof that the American founders were really just capitalist pigs. The lie is so huge now, and so unreasonable, that the liars can say our American property rights and affluent lifestyles are the REASON for war, terrorism, suffering, and poverty directly caused by Imperialist's raping and pillaging the globe for centuries. How logical and sound is THAT argument?
In 1791, Thomas Paine wrote a treatise called The Rights of Man. Paine argued that freedom and justice exist only under constitutional governments "arising out of society."
Paine thrashed the British Imperial aristocracy and their claim to benevolent rule. He openly taunted a British scholar, Mr. Edmund Burke, to produce a constitution written by and for the English people, as opposed to a top-down English version of a constitution.
Paine discounted the British constitution as a fake, mocking it as a history of hereditists' claims to power and a Parliamentary code of ethics for colonial rulers. He ridiculed all European Monarchists for supporting a system of government that invites total fools and clinically insane heirs to be rulers, simply to maintain a "superior" family blood line. (20)
Thomas Paine's writings are said to have spurred the outmanned and outgunned American revolutionaries to stay in the fight against the powerful and deadly British Military forces.
The American colonials successfully revolted against the Imperial English Monarchy via armed rebellion. After they won, their constitution was created to protect them from the many people left in the world (and in America) who supported monarchical rule. But, just because the upstart American commoners won their silly revolution didn't mean the ruling families of London, Paris, Vienna or Boston gave up their fundamental belief system, or became enlightened and suddenly adhered to the principles of liberty and justice for all.
The American Revolution in 1776 did not change the aristocratic mind-set one iota. The international ruling elites of the 18th century were raised and educated to believe they were "born" gifted in the arts of governing stupid peasants, workers, and tribal people. Their ruling principle was in their "superior Anglo-Saxon breeding." Birthright was all the proof they needed to show why all the lowly people must be governed by them. (21)
Our founders were perfectly clear about what they considered to be man's natural rights. The aristocratic ideal of birthright was wiped out of the law by the Americans when they threw off the yoke of British Imperialism by cutting the British heirs out of the American Will. They eliminated forever a foreigner's "right" to control American lives, production, trade, land, or resources. The Americans didn't sever the head of their ruling monarch; they didn't digress into anarchy and chaos.. what they did was "enlightening." Once the war was over, they simply fired the King and dismissed all of his useless colonial rulers.
The American Revolution was the ultimate struggle between the producers of goods and the superior Imperialists who benevolently steal all the goods away from the producers. It wasn't empty political rhetoric about "equality and liberty" that prompted good American men to fight the British; it was the daily thievery of goods and nepotism practiced by the British ruling "nabobs." The Americans did not recognize the "right" to benevolently steal. Americans of the 18th century knew exactly WHO the enemies of individual freedom are.
The enemies of freedom were the pro-monarchists representing "old money." Our enemies were the British Imperial agents assigned to direct the American colonies. The local lords, i.e.: appointed governors who gave prized land to their Imperialist friends, and the Hessian Army with it's "superior training;" these were most definitely "the bad guys."
It wasn't that hard for even the most uneducated American immigrant to see how patently unfair the British Royal ideology was to the hard working pioneers doing all the work. The founders didn't hate the ruling families enough to guillotine them. They insisted on assurances that the ruling elites could no longer steal America's wealth under hereditary law. They just wanted to keep the profits from the sweat of their own hands and labor.
When the American Thomas Paine successfully attacked the very foundation of inequality in the monarchical system of government, he opened Pandora's Box. When American colonials went on to defeat the British, and won their freedom... all hell broke loose.
Racism, class issues, and colonialism bathed in the ideology of family superiority. The ruling families of Europe were attached to the ruling monarchies as soldiers, bankers, lawyers and clergy for centuries before our puny American revolution. Several American families during the Revolution had very, very strong ties to the international ruling elites, and many were only living in America to perform their "family" duties to Mother England.
Assigned to America as bankers, overseers, merchants, and tax collectors for the King, the American aristocracy was about to lose everything to the commoners. So many of the Imperialist families had received huge western land grants from the English King, and the stupid colonials were clamoring for a more fair distribution of American soil, telling the new federal government to "open up the western lands" for immigrants and settlers.
No matter what kind of limited educations they had, the American colonials understood one important "fact" of life: What did Gerald O'Hara admonish his daughter in "Gone With the Wind" to never forget? And what did she fall back on when she lost her slaves and all the family's slave wealth? "It's the land, Katie Scarlet, it's the land." Controlling private land was a primary motivator for the 1776, 90% landowner American population. When a man contols his property he has all the potential of becoming self-sufficient. (22)
The British Imperialists and our own American aristocrats were facing financial ruin.
(The esteemed and revered?) American author Anton Chaitkin tells a lively story about the families "well-connected" to the Royals after the American Revolution. His thoroughly documented treatise, "Treason in America," spells out all the families, their businesses, and the organizations they founded. Chaitkin painstakingly leads us to a whole group of these pro-British folks who lived in the Northeast, families with interests in the Dutch and British East India Companies, and in the Chinese Opium Trade. He explains why, by the year 1801, our U.S. Vice-president was the traitor Aaron Burr, and our U.S. Treasury Secretary was a wealthy foreign, international, Swiss banker named Albert Gallatin (1761-1849). (23)
As a direct consequence of the American "idea" of individual liberty, (and the globalist's governing "idea" of using the military to control Free Trade zones), British colonialism was severely diminished. Free Trade was "proven" by the American upstart scholars and elected politicians to be part of the European Imperialist's design to rule the world. (24)
One of the first things the United States government did was to stop the flood of English exports into the states. The British game was to require its "subjects" to purchase only British controlled goods, and only through British merchants. Americans severed the Free Trade contracts, and then took it one step further by creating and distributing their OWN money, which took them right out of the European banking nightmare behind the throne.
Then they set about building a free country, based on the principles of individual liberty.
Our local bank financed local infrastructure for producers to move their goods to local markets. Strong tariffs protected the local industries from loss to cheap foreign slave labor flourishing under the phony Imperialist umbrella of free trade.
British Free Trade was so successful in the Middle East it almost wiped India's industry out of existence. Free Trade in Africa destroyed every tribe on the continent. Free Opium Trade with China was defended with British guns and warships. Free Trade introduced Asia, South, Central, and North America to genocide and puppet governments. The only Western Anglo-dominated arena that protected mostly white (or gutsy brown) lower-class commoners engaged in open markets (and real free trade) was the USA. (25)
Germany, Japan, Russia and even Canada and Australia were looking into the American system as a way to get THEIR OWN countries out of the Free Trade fiasco perpetrated by the global imperialist merchants. No reasonable man committed to his love of home and hearth could have accepted Imperialist's logic for why his children must stay slaves. (26)
In 1844 Friedrich Engels wrote the Condition of the Working Class, and then Karl Marx wrote an attack on Friedrich Lists' book, The National System of Political Economy. Anton Chaitkin explains the long unpublished ("ugly" ) draft where Herr Marx called List "a plagiarist, a corrupt defender of special interests (German manufacturers), a liar." (27)
Marx uses ad hominum to accuse List of attacking his enemies and not their arguments, calling Friedrich List "a German philistine* who ....... casts aspersions on the English and French economists and retails gossip about them." (28)
For the good of mankind, the American Union simply could not be allowed to exist. It's not a "conspiracy theory," it's just what British merchants called American economics. (29)
There were so many ongoing international plots and domestic plans against the fledgling U.S. government that the U.S. Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts in 1798, a mere eight years after ten states ratified the U.S. Constitution in 1789. (30) And Thomas Paine was not the only American revolutionary who did not trust the monarchists. Many founding Americans argued bitterly, until death, against the appointments of men with ties to the international elites. But the commoners lost in 1801; there's been in an ongoing "class war" between free American commoners and U.S. Imperial Monarchists ever since.
*(Philistine- n- 1. a member of a non-Semetic people who lived in southwestern Palestine from c. 1200 B.C. on: they repratedly warred with the Israelites for control of the country. a- 1. of the ancient Philistines 2. smugly conventional, lacking in cuture, etc.)
Americans had to shoot at the British again, in the Second War of Independence of 1812, because their Army kept control of our forts (and ran British trained Indian warriors), and the British Navy wouldn't stop Trade embargoes or kidnapping our American sailors for slaves on their merchant ships. Aristocratic merchants waited with baited breath as the British Imperial Army burned the American Capital to the ground. But those pesky Americans did it all over again, and this time, those low-bred, inferior, mongrel Yanks defeated the Imperial British Navy! They went and shot up the Imperialist power to impose Free Trade. (31)
What a nightmare for the globalist merchants, how they must have wept.
The British goal, which openly continued throughout the 19th century, was to dominate the seas and all land based manufacturing by controlling international trade routes. All of our American colonial business, manufacturing, agriculture, and Trade had been totally controlled by the ruling American oligarchic families. They had a hard time giving it up.
Plus, the American resistance to Imperial oligarchic rule was an inspiration to every British, Dutch, Spanish, Portuguese and French colony the world. The growth of the American system of self-governance was under attack from its very inception, especially from those persons who had the most to lose if colonial laborers all decided to set themselves free. No other colony could be allowed to copy the American's success.
he American ideals of individual liberty had the power to destroy the Imperialist world.
Something HAD to be done to stop this madness, before the young freedom virus infected every colony across the globe guided by benevolent masters. Where would aristocrats get their money if the slaves in Africa, India or South Carolina declared themselves FREE?
The Americans' idea that societies have the "Right" to get together and write a binding contract for a specific system of representative democratic government was untenable. To even suggest that an overthrown monarchical government is required to abide by a newly founded "free" nation's constitution, (i.e.: a federal constitution established via a state and national voting procedure), was considered a most ridiculous and dangerous ideology. (32)
The British ruling elites insist common-born people cannot govern themselves. The English constitution "grants" them certain individual rights, whereas the American constitution "recognizes" that the common man has clear, individual, inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. The American Constitution eliminated the Monarchy; the British Constitution masks the source of power with fancy language. (33)
So, in the 19th century, the British Imperial Navy changed its course, and was well into making "friends" with lovely indigenous peoples who begged to languish under British Colonial Rule (once they accepted it as inevitable). The British Navy was no longer a bully terrorizing world populations, they were "civilized" mapmakers creating safe depth maps for future Free Trading in every port visited by the well armed British Navy ships.
Accompanying the peacekeeping farce were a new breed of elite British scientists (the most famous being Charles Darwin), whose "government job" was to catalog all the indigenous plants, geology, sea life, and natural resources where his ship visited. (34)
By 1900, the British Navy and British scientists had inventoried all the available world's wealth, and in 1924 the British successfully introduced the world to their social theory, called Fabian socialism. They crafted a wonderful illusion of themselves as kind hearted masters, as devoted social scientists promoting social equity. They also created a brand new science "of man" that would eventually give them power over every inch of the planet, with complete power over every human and natural resource worth extracting.
What is the term environmentalism, and where did it originate? It all started with a well publicized "theory" presented to the world by an English naturalist named Darwin. His theory of evolution became the basis for the British-European-elitist, Anglo-Saxon belief in white racial superiority over indigenous brown and black people in Africa, South and North America, Australia, and anywhere else where the local people weren't white. (35) White Supremacy and anti-Semitism in the United States are both variations of this theory.
The "science" of Anthropology was created for Americans by Albert Gallatin in 1836, (installed in Washington under the Jefferson administration, Gallatin stayed in power until his death). His scientific studies of inferior tribal people paved the way to social sciences, was the way inside for The National Institute for the Promotion of Science in 1840, which paved the way in 1844 for the Smithsonian Institute and Conservationism (borrowed from the British term "Conservator," used by them to manage forests and Free Trade in India).
The new "American" science of anthropology culminated in the First Eugenics Congress in London in 1912 (where Charles Darwin's son Leonard was the chair), and in the Second Eugenics Congress in New York in 1921 (attended by Gifford Pinchot, founder of the U.S. Forest Service). Herr Adolph Hitler was a celebrated speaker at the Third. (36)
British "natural sciences" opened the door to turn the American Western states into National Forests in 1905, and finally shut down the promise of "40 acres and a mule." Conservation became the umbrella for all the new sciences created by the naturalists, and many more "conservation" plans were passed in the U.S. throughout the 20th century.
When a globalist Conference "suggested" stronger land management regulations, the U.S. passed the Federal Land Management Act of 1975. Now, all our present Environmental Protections and Endangered Species Acts completely supersede our Constitutional Law.
Think this is all just too unbelievable? Consider where they're going with it, then consider two major contributing factors to our success as a free nation: agriculture and industry.
The latest in this series of new sciences introduced to Americans by the British scientific elites is their undefinable scientific theory of "sustainable development." (37)