The Balance of Man, Part Two: The Emperor's New Laws
by Niki Friedrich Raapana, January 4, 2003
The new term "sustainable development" was introduced at the UN by The Brandt Commission, at Rio, in 1992, and they gave us a lovely definition that tells us absolutely nothing about what it actually means. (37a) The new term defines an international program to implement a new legal system of ensuring social justice via government sponsored and funded corporate development. It effectively destroys ALL local control and management of our American education, agriculture, trade and industry. Sustainable development puts us under the suffocating yoke of benevolent rulers, only this time, Imperialist "scientists" are the rulers... and this time... our revolutionary American government is fully complicit.
Sustainable development has been delivered to Americans by self-promoted elites who are all "accredited" global environmental scientists committed to the creation of a "New World Order." President Bush didn't make up the term New World Order back in 1991 in his infamous State of the Union Address. The New World Order is the stated goal of the International Socialist Party and the intellectual elites who brought us the Bolsheviks. (39)
Sustainable Development is brought to us by the same "breed" of scientists who brought us eugenics. Eugenics is a lovely Victorian theory used by anthropologists to "prove" the American Indians were less developed "savages," totally without a history or a culture worth saving or respecting. The elite British and American Eugenics Congress happily provided Hitler with the "science" to fuel his racism. Eugenics is the "final solution." (40)
Friedrich Engels praised the works of Henry Lewis Morgan's Researches in the "Lines of Human Progress from Savagery through Barbarism to Civilization," and Chaitkin explains how Marxists adapted the theory of human progress (with American Indians in Middle Barbarism), and eventually led us full circle to the "return to Mother Earth" movement. (41)
UN Local Agenda 21 is the globalist's plan to implement sustainable development, and it includes turning 50% of America into wilderness reserves for animals and plants, with any development of land and natural resources under strict control of the natural scientists. (42)
Local Agenda 21 is a blueprint for the biggest land grab the world has ever seen. It's not only rebuilding all our urban areas into visions of "more livable communities," it's not only assuming dictatorial environmental policies that drive small farmers off their farms, and it's not only a programme claiming control over all the natural resources ON the land (including humans). It's also, and most importantly, a plan to balance our people's laws.
Balancing the Fifth Amendment, via a U.S. Wildlands Act, was "suggested" by socialist environmentalists at the United Nation's Earth Summit at Rio, in 1992. And that wasn't the only thing the socialists "suggested" at Rio. They asked for "better enforcement." (43)
But the UN globalists know free Americans won't go for a globalist "balancing" of their beloved "rights," so they designed a softer, easier way to convince Americans that they all agreed to comply. The Balancing Act will never be put on a ballot before American voters.
The UN Earth Summit at Rio in '92 put out an "urgent call" to all member nations, and politely suggested all governments create "local" sustainable development committees and councils in order to further inter-agency partnership goals laid out in Agenda 21. (44)
That's why, in 1993, our beloved President Clinton established the President's Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD). The U.S. Department of Agriculture immediately jumped on the sustainable development bandwagon, and rewrote their mission statement to that effect. By 1999, the entire United States was under some sort of new land management programme, and thousands of Americans are feeling the sting of the new ruler's whips cracking down on their formerly free backs. Free Americans don't quite remember proper slave-like behaviors, so Local Agenda 21 is here to teach us how. (45)
Throughout the early 90's, stories circulated about people losing their property under wacko new legislation designed to protect land from American farmers and industry. (45a)
Regardless of the stated purposes for the "new laws," Americans complained about how often their protected land mysteriously ended up in the hands of corporate developers. The Property Rights "movement" has been ridiculed and denigrated by the new scientists as an example of American's greed and selfishness. Property rights are a serious, ongoing issue, and it's the one completely avoided by the mainstream press (unless it's to be ridiculed).
By 1995, Al Gore's Reinventing Citizenship Project provided a brilliant "adaptation" for a more modern colonial system designed by British scholars. It will successfully change the basic structure of the free American political system, once and for all. (46)
Local Agenda 21 is the culmination of over two centuries of hard work by the Imperialists and represents many arranged marriages and unimaginable billions in Swiss francs and British pounds used to fund the grants that enticed every sector of American government.
Today we are faced with a whole new interpretation of what the American idea of freedom means, and it's amazingly similar to the 226 year old Imperialist argument put forth by the "greatest" Western writers of the 18th century (like Edmund Burke). (47)
Two centuries after the American revolution, Americans have been duped into believing in the very system they overthrew in 1776. The American's Declaration of Independence, The Constitutional Convention of 1787, and the resulting Constitution of the United States with the First Ten Amendments in 1791, have all been successfully balanced and rewritten to define a new British global empire of free trade, called "The Third Way." (48)
The Third Way is based on an obscure philosophy called communitarianism, and its modern roots are in the socialist Fabian Society of British Prime Minister Tony Blair. (49)
The Fabian Society was created in England in 1884 to "further the goals of international socialism through propaganda and infiltration," as opposed to violent socialist revolutions. Early members of the Society include authors H.G.Wells and Bertrand Russell. (50)
H.G. Wells is explicit, in his non-fiction and fiction both, describing what all nationalist societies must do in order to achieve a Fabian-socialist, utopian vision of world peace and justice. From its inception, the Fabian Society has insisted national constitutions must be balanced against socialist "equity" laws. The Society seeks to govern EVERYONE in the world under their version of an International "Criminal" Court. The Fabian Society's 2002-2003 first listed priority is simply stated as: "Globalization and the new world order." (51)
The Fabians merged with the socialist Labour Party in 1900, and by 1997 they had placed 200 MPs in the British government, including PM Tony Blair. Throughout the 1990's President Clinton, (Rhodes Scholar and Oxford alumni), openly endorsed Blair's Fabian Third Way Agenda. Tony Blair claims he learned the term from Bill Clinton. (52)
In October, 2002, ex-President William Jefferson Clinton spoke before the British Labor Party's "Third Way" Forum. Clinton praised British Prime Minister Tony Blair as a good friend, and said his two years of schooling at Oxford were two of the best years of his life. Clinton represented the free US's New Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), the innovative Democratic political party that helped him ascend to the presidency in 1992.
How many Americans were told that Clinton's "new American democrats" are aligned with an international socialist programme designed by Imperial British "scholars" of the 21st century? And how many Americans know what communitarianism is?
In 1994, Clinton applauded Dr. Etzioni and the Department of Education's program to help create "a new communitarian vision for America." (53) What program was that?
Since 1979, Amitai Etzioni, a celebrated Third Way "thinker," (currently the Director of the obscure Communitarian Studies Program at George Washington University in DC), has been a Senior White House staff advisor to U.S. Presidents Carter, Reagan, Clinton, and Bush Jr. Mike Allen of the Washington Post identifies 11 communitarian thinkers in Bush White House. (54)
Fabian Socialism and The Democratic Leadership Council both embrace the global ideal of a world-wide communitarian government. When Americans voted for Bill Clinton, they were voting for communitarianism; they were actually voting away their protection against the global elites, voting away freedom clearly outlined under the U.S. Constitution and the U.S. Bill of Rights. An admitted liar and exposed sexual predator, Clinton spoke before the British Labor Party about his personal commitment to American family "values." (55)
Communitarian-Third Way thinkers have perfected bullshit in a way that would make any con-man proud, especially the phony Texan in the White House, whose phony father sold himself to American voters using an unbelievable Texas oilfield rags-to-riches story. (56)
It was most unsettling to learn the truth about the Bush family and the facts surrounding Grandpa Prescott Bush's indictments in 1945 for Trading with the Nazis in W.W.II. The family tie to "big oil" (in the Bush's Carlyle cartel) includes the Binladen family, and Jeb Bush's neat little New American Century group is endorsed by Dr. Amitai Etzioni. (57)
Why do reporters steer clear of Amitai Etzioni and the whole Communitarian Network?
How many law schools has Etzioni taught communitarian law to in the past decade? What is his "new moral dialogue," and how does it differ from open, free, public debate? What is Etzioni's current tie to Israeli Zionists, and why is the United States creating a new legal council to incorporate Judaic Law into U.S. law schools (endorsed by 3 U.S. Supreme Court Justices)? (58) (Do they use a Babylonian Talmud or the original Jeruselem Talmud?)
The U.S. Constitution is not based on the Seven Noachide Laws. (58a) Why does the current U.S. President congratulate their efforts and encourage their study of innovative ways of "returning" us to ancient Jewish values, supporting as acceptable the balancing of our constitution against the 2000 year old Talmudic system of law? And what Imperial country "left" the Zionist-Fabian-soldier Dr. Etzioni to fight for Palestine in 1949? (59)
Innovative new communitarian laws are now taught in every law school in the United States. It's no secret to the ruling American scientific elites, and it's not part of any conspiracy theory, other than the one George Washington talked about back in 1796. (59a)
President Washington warned us in his farewell address about how we must "resist with care the innovation upon its [U.S. constitutional] principles, however specious the pretexts." (Specious means "appearing just, fair or proper without really being so.") (60)
Since the revolution, Anti-Federalist supporters of Great Britain and European colonialism (and their Viennese financiers) have barely concealed their ongoing attempts to undermine and put an end to the radical new form of American constitutional government, a fact that promoted passage of the still unchallenged Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798. (61)
Innovative, Third Way communtarian laws seek to "balance" the unfettered "rights" of U.S. citizens. Citing UN sponsored "legal" precedents, they justify national democratic governments overturning their constitutional laws in favor of global "social justice." (62)
Local Agenda 21 is the big UN LIE. It's the British Imperialist's "scientific" blueprint for the biggest land grab (under the biggest lie) the world has ever seen. (63)
Today, the modern Fabian middle-left is the final piece of the "dialectic." Using the Hegelian theory, they pit one true and reasonable ideology against a no-reason false ideology and come up with a false ideology that incorporates the most fascist elements of no-reason. The Third Way is the communitarian balancing of the constant resolution of the opposite "forces" of capitalist materialism and communist collectivism. (64)
In the Hegelian dialectic, A is capitalism, B is communism, and C is communitarianism.
In otherwords, A - is power inherent in the people (thesis) B - is power inherent in the state (antithesis) C - is power inherent in the community (synthesis).
Did you have a hard time understanding dialectic materialism (if you tried to study it at all)? Did anyone ever bother to explain to you what part modern environmentalism plays in the Hegelian dialectic? Are you having hard time understanding what it has to do with it now? You're not alone if you say Hegel, Marx or Engels confuse you. In fact, if you can say they confuse you, then that means you actually GOT IT! Get it? Why does everyone assume Americans are too stupid to understand a simple ABC formula? If A and B exist, therefore C exists. What's SO hard about that? We're not that "dumbed down," are we? No, we're not. We can all grasp a simple ABC Modus Ponens algebraic formula passed down from Aristotle, the "father" of logic, fully intact, to our founders fathers. (65) American patriots USED Modus Ponens to declare man's natural rights!
It's not the FORMULA that's confusing, it's the SEMANTICS of the new Hegelian dialectic formula we don't understand. Their WORDS don't make any sense to us. Why? Because some silly British and German "philosophers" eliminated reason and then made up all the "new" words so that we'd become confused, feel stupid, and just quit asking, "What in God's name are you TALKING about?"
The narrators and "teachers" of the philosophy of NO-Reason assure us there are MANY flaws to all the "theories," but don't worry, we're the experts, trust us, it's all okay because Hegel and Marx were just so brilliant nobody could understand them. (66)
Now, in the 21st century, the "extreme" and often "violent" clashes of differences between capitalism and communism makes moderate socialism the "perfect" solution. It gives British and international socialists a solution to a big, unsolvable problem. They even get to be our heroes! Due to centuries of painstaking work, diligently performed by selfless humanitarians like Lenin, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot, we've been "presented" with ta da! a new middle political ground. We are presented with an unarguable (because it's unreasonable) global answer to the conflict between the Lenin/Stalin/Blair/Castro internationalists, and the Mussolini/Hitler/Bush/Sharon/Mao nationalists. (67)
The Third Way even brings the Mother Church back into the political system. How lovely. The Third Way is the middle-Left's answer to all our unsung prayers. (68)
It's never described this way, but I have come to call it the "totalitarian middle," because several of the new communitarian law enforcement "laws" are undeniably frightening. The USA Patriot Act of 2001 and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 are arguably much more powerful than the Nuremberg Laws and the "racial purity" Acts passed by the Nazis in 1934-35. (35) In the U.S., the Ninth District Circuit Court of Appeals just handed down a 3-Judge decision that interprets the Second Amendment as being written with a communitarian clause, backing up Etzioni's Fabian assertion that the 2nd Amendment only supports community militias (like the Mossad) "as opposed to individual gun-slingers." (69)
Then there's this whole DARPA and Total Information Awareness business, a big part of the Fabian's communitarian-sustainable development plan (and all new U.S. Anti-Terrorist legislation). The FBI now helps "volunteers" and appointed community councils to work with the Pentagon on identifying possible "terrorists." The FBI and the CIA teach them how to gather citizen's data, in order to utilize crime-mapping technologies and identify all the local resident's skills and abilities. It's all necessary to fulfill the expected community capacity during "emergencies." The DARPA database is a Hitlerite's wetdream. (70)
Is it surprising that the Bush administration is appointing convicted criminals to support the most powerful law enforcement agency in the history of the world, when we can all easily access and read the rosters of the Carslyle Group and The Project for A New American Century? Why are all the big oil companies so interested in developing partnerships and information networks that share data and mapping technology under WTO's Free Trade? (71)
Why has it been okay for top US government officials to leave office to become private partners in oil based technology firms that seek rights to U.S. government contracts worth billions? (67) Is this our beloved American system? Our founding fathers were very clear about the purpose and the logic behind the U.S. Constitution. (72)
There's not one historical document that calls us international police or a communitarian nation. Not one. What we have are a lot of warnings from Hamilton and Washington to be ever vigilant in preserving our unique individual freedom, because of the many plots underway from the beginning, with so many different ones designed to take it all away.
Dare we forget why Hamilton was murdered in a duel by the traitor Aaron Burr, or why Hamilton and J.Q. Adams got more and more "argumentative" in their later years? Why do "modern" American texbooks leave out the details surrounding WHO Benedict Arnold really, how he was "related" to Burr, and where and how he died? (73)
Is it merely a coincidence that all of our murdered presidents were men of vision who had strong federalist views that included protecting the young free Union from dissolving into European colonial city-states? It appears none of the good guys were ever allowed to live. By the 1960's, they weren't even allowed close; Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy was murdered as he ran on a platform that called for blacks and whites to unite in peace. (What's the odds Attorney Caroline Kennedy will step to the plate for our floundering republic, use her untarnished American reputation to defend America in our Constitutional Courts and legally take back our rights under our original U.S. Nationalist principles?)
Is it merely a coincidence that the term "conspiracy theory" appeared on the U.S. scene in 1987, about the same time the globalists were finalizing plans for Local Agenda 21? The British "scholars" are all over patriotic America's "fascination" with the conspiracy theory, and they're putting together the definitive, scholarly work on this "new phenomena." (74)
The conspiracy theory is used to discount every author or American scholar attempting to research and document American history from a Federalist perspective. Brilliant works by American authors are all ridiculed and discounted by British "scholars" from Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Columbia, and by the rest of those esteemed and revered colleges that control American thought. (75)
The educated elites write and publish American history books, and, not surprisingly, they all gloss-over the very real threats to our nation posed by the pro-Imperialist Americans throughout our entire 226 year history. Americans should question the ruse that says British trained "scholars" are the only legitimate source for American history. It's a lie.
We should insist that we, the victors, write our OWN history. What victorious nation allows the loser nation to rewrite the victor's account of the battles? What idiocy is that?
The lines between America and Great Britain have been SO successfully blurred that we elected a British trained Rhodes Scholar to two presidential terms. Bill Clinton was trained in the elite Oxford setting that brought the World unaccountable troubles and disasters. He ran on a socialist-British platform, and within a year of his election he signed the order and established the path for implementing the globalist's Local Agenda 21 across our country.
Wait a minute, you say? Bill Clinton did NOT run as a British-socialist? How dare I slander our beloved ex-president? What do I have to back up this ludicrous claim? Well, there's a lot of ways to find out more about Bill Clinton, and Al Gore, and George W. Bush, more than what we see on the TV or can read in our newspapers and magazines. The strange thing is that these boys don't hide their imperialist-globalist affiliations, nor do they shroud their treasonous activities in anything but transparent film. (76)
Peel back ONE layer of the crap you're being fed by the "national" media, and use your deliberately dumbed-down American education to look at the organizations they belong to. (77)
Read their goals and the mission statements of their affiliates. Look up all the NEW words they use in their missions and goals... you'll find many of their scientific terms have NO DEFINITION. Then, go read up on some of their exact new "programmes," and scan the verbiage and see how it all sounds like just so much scientific-jargon-gobble-de-goop. At first it may not make any sense (it is a NO-reason conspiracy "theory", after all), but eventually you'll get a lovely, almost poetic ringing in your ears after the same words pop up over and over.
Sustainable: NO legal DEFINITION. Livability: NO legal DEFINITION. Quality of life: NO legal DEFINITION. Social justice: NO legal DEFINITION. Community: NO legal DEFINITION. Community police: Friendlier COPS. Noise: NO legal DEFINITION, crime problems, NO legal DEFINITION.
The proponents of UN sponsored environmental planning, across America, ALL admit they have no legal definition for any of these terms. At most they'll say: "It's evolving."
Yet, and here's the kicker, these exact terms are used in major American Initiatives (Al Gore's Building Livable Communities Initiative), Presidential decrees (President Clinton's Council on Sustainable Development), and local police mission statements (such as Seattle Police Department's #1 Goal: to increase livability by reducing fear). COPS' Municipal Revised Noise Ordinances are being implemented across local America (Designed for coopertaive neighbors to be trained hand out the "tickets," Seattle's Revision was tabled in 2001 after it was pushed on a Post-WTO-N30, too-aware public; it had no clear way to gage noise levels). (73)
From the United Nations to the White House, through our federal and state legislatures, down to county and municipal government, we are told to meekly submit to hundreds of new laws that restrict our freedoms, and yet they can't give us ONE good definition for any the terms that define the "principles" and terms they use in their laws? (79)
And if we dare to act like frank, American, low-bred Yanks, and outright demand our globalist scholarly "leaders" give us definitions of terms that they CANNOT DEFINE,
WE!!?? are called the wacko conspiracy theorists?? How convenient for them.
Educated and credible American historians and scholars are being lumped in with the "alien theorists" (who believe in all kinds of bizarre accounts of abductions, sightings, and underground tunnels in Denver). In Wisconsin, Americans who arrived to testify in public hearings on their state MEPHA law, (a new medical emergency legislation that gives the state power to declare martial law, passed in most states), were insulted and told to sit in the part of the room reserved for "those who believe in Blackhawk helicopters." (80)
Hundreds of American political groups are identified by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) as "terrorist" and militia wackos, and while some are obviously insane people (and who most interestingly endorse the global eugenicist's original platform), others, like the tax resisters are only trying to get to the bottom of the bogus tax laws, asking why the IRS is a private collection agency representing the private corporate entity called the Federal Reserve. (81)
I've been so impressed with We The People Foundation's tax law work, I admire Bob Schultz for his wit and dedication, and I'm horrified the ADL slandered his good name. (82) He couldn't believe anybody called him a terrorist for driving to D.C. to petition the US Congress, and he said he doesn't know who the ADL is, but he's sure as heck gonna find out. Does the Jewish ADL website that identifies American tax resisters as terrorists represent the "social justice" we can expect after we balance our constitution against Judaic Talmudic laws?
Why did Vanity Fair run a story about "possible" connections between right wing militias and Muslim "hot spots" in South America. No hard evidence, just a possibility. (83)
Why isn't one mainstream American magazine or newspaper writing a series on what's happening in America under the United Nations Sustainable Development Programme? Why aren't Pulitzer Prize winning, American investigative journalists uncovering and explaining the activities of Etzioni and his Communitarian Network, or what's up with the Fabian Society's Third Way partnership with Blair, Clinton, Sharon and Bush Jr.?
Why aren't the appointments of "the old-boy Reagan-Bush-CIA network," to TOP Homeland Security positions, BIGGER news? Is it "news" that the "pardoned" John Poindexter went straight into the private sector developing the software program to run DARPA's anti-terrorist mapping systems? Is the reason he's been appointed, (being reported to us as: he's "passionate about it" ) what the mainstream press is allowed to pass off as good old-fashioned American, Chicago Trib' style investigative journalism? (84)
It's all news in the American alternative press.. but they're just wackos who believe in Blackhawk helicopters, right? (Blackhawk helicopters DO exist, btw, so do Apaches.. it's a far stretch to include belief in their existence as part of a conspiracy theory. Scholarly experts all seem to posses quite vivid, distorted imaginations. Must be in the "breeding.")
While I'm on this conspiracy theory vein, I have to ask: What is URBAN warfare?
Does it have anything to do with URBAN re-development? Are the other nice American snipers at the URBAN Warfare training school in Tacoma, WA, in a partnership with the sweet Homeland Securityand our international covert-action heroes in the CIA? (85)
Is there an inter-agency partnership between the Tom Clancy "styled" CIA agents and the Seattle DOJ-FBI office? Do the nice FBI agents who direct the super-nice Seattle Police Department's Community Oriented Policing Services (COPS) also work with their equally nice citizen-based "volunteers"in the nice Neighborhood Watch Program? (86)
Will urban snipers be necessarily used to further sustainable development, if "preventing crime and terrorism" are a major part of the world-wide rebuilding sustainable and livable communities goals? How much "authority" does the Homeland Security Act give snipers? Does the Pentagon have access to all our private data gathered in the Seattle Community Mapping, Planning and Analysis for Safety Strategies (COMPASS) programme? (88)
Is it news that the government is gathering ALL our private data, and balancing the Bill of Rights against the needs of the community, for the international "common good?" Does it help John and the Pentagon that there's NO EXACT DEFINITION for terrorist? (89)
Does it help us --- the U.S.-- that there IS a definition for "The Common Good?" (90)
Isn't it time WE remembered who WE are, and where WE came from?
This country was founded on INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY for the COMMON MAN, not, not, NOT on COMMUNITY VALUES for the common good. The Former Soviet Union was based on protecting the common good. Communist China is based on protecting the common good.
The United States Constitution is absolutely NOT based on a vague "theory" of global social equity and justice. Our system of government does not designate appointed councils to teach us ancient Babylonian religions or give license to pass off Masonic alchemy as science... (91)
With all this new balancing of man's rights, is it prudent to follow Thomas Paine's lead?
Shall we ask the globalists to produce this new American Constitution that arose from our informed, free society? Can the globalists PROVE their new laws are NOT arbitrary? (92)
Let's MAKE them produce a legal document that gives them the RIGHT, and our express permission, to balance any part of our original contract with our subservient government.
The reality is, the globalists don't have one, and we do. So let's use it. If the U.S. Supreme Court will not uphold the constitution then at least we will finally know why.
We are about to lose our freedom to openly committed insane people. We are about to live under a government that REFUTES logic. The new world government is designed to hurt a rational brain. The only way to stop the pain is to figure out the dialectic using Aristotle for a guide. The Third Way is the communists' final solution to the conflict of Reason against No-More-Reason.
Now, thanks to Darwin, Kant, Fichte, Comte, Spencer, Schopenhauer, Hegel, Marx, Engels, Wilson, TR, Pinchot, Gallatin, Harriman, Dulles, Burr, Arnold, Rhodes, Wells, Blair, Etzioni, Putnam, Kelling, Cisernos, Clinton, Cheney, Bush and many others, the US is synthesized into a new rule under more morally superior leaders who operate under the false ideology of a more moral NO-Reason. (93)
We're going to allow our entire country to be "rebuilt" by the global social scientists who are going to eradicate poverty by the year 2020? (89) Now our government can assert that we are "willing" to give up our Bill of Rights to "help fight terrorism?" Now we're happy to have a whole new system of government that gives legal powers to unelected "local" councils who operate as Soviets? We're that ready to be conscripted? (94)
There is NO American constitution at the community government level. The more-moral group in charge of everybody now cannot be bothered with free elections or committees who question their every move. "Some sacrifices need to be made for the greater good," our Seattle community government officials tell us. "It's a livability issue," they explain.
"Nationalism must be ended," is their network's mantra. (95) And you're all right. I agree with all my critics. No matter how many times I tried to "explain my problem," it didn't make ANY sense. Now, thank God, I finally understand that it was NEVER supposed to. I guarantee you most of our esteemed US public officials haven't got a clue that they're pawns in the Hegelian dialectic, any more than I did when I first started asking questions. I guess the difference between me and the new more nervous, complicit, communitarian Hegelian pawns is I just thought my questions deserved answers, and so I answered them.
Come on America! Stop communitarian laws. The country you save may be your own. God Bless America, land of the FREE and the home of the brave. Let's PLAY BALL!-- with the globalists! We lost the first three games, but we can still TAKE the series!
We're up. Who's at bat? Who's on deck? Anybody on first? Do we have a coach?
"Give me liberty or give me death," said one hundred million pawns.
"Okay," said Lenin, Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot, "we can do that."
Notes for parts 1 & 2
(These notes are, as of January 27, incomplete. We're working on it!)
1. Paine, Thomas, "Common Sense," 1776
2. Aiken, Henry D., "The Age of Ideology, The 19th Century Philosophers," 1956. pp. 190-193. The New American Library of World Literature.
3. Ibid., pp. VII-VIII
4. Ibid., p. 188, "The fact that Hegel tended to confuse logical contradiction with material contrariety or conflict did not faze Marx, who was even less interested in the properties of formal logic than Hegel himself."
5. Chaitkin, Anton, "Treason in America: From Aaron Burr to Averell Harriman", 1998, Executive Intelligence Review, DC (First printed by New Benjamin Franklin House, 1985)
6. Minnesota Public Radio-"The Surveillance Society/Amitai Etzioni". Nov. 19, 1999. mpr.org/features/199911/15_newsroom_privacy/etzioni.html. also: 1999 Pennsylvania Current: Etzioni calls for limits on privacy/forum: upenn/edu/pennnews/ current/1999/ 040199/Etzioni.html
7. Webster's New Twentieth Dictionary, Second Edition: "The method of logic used by Hegel and adapted by Marx to his materialist philosophy: it is based on the contradiction of opposites (thesis and antithesis) and their continual resolution (synthesis)."
7a. Beaty, John, "The Iron Curtain Over America", 1952, Wilkenson Publishing Company, Dallas, TX. Beaty quotes US Ambassador to Poland, Arthur Bliss Lane, who asked (and was never answered), in 1952, "Who at the very top levels of the United States Government, ordered the hiding of all intelligence reports unfavorable to the Soviets, and the dissemination only of lies and communist propaganda?" p. 82
8. Chaitkin, ibid. p. 303. also: Beaty, ibid. p 97 refers to "Directive M-65, dated May 31, 1951, of the National Production Authority," which provides that 'plates which have not been used for more than four years or are otherwise deemed to be obsolete' must be delivered 'to a scap metal dealer.'" On p. 98, Beaty quotes Upton Close, a "writer on the Orient who stood in the way of the Lattimore-Hiss gang and the Marshall's giving of China to the Communists," who claimed that such an order "wiped out" all his books on China and Japan." Close wrote: "...It is much more clever than Hitler's burning of books. The public never sees the melting of plates in private foundaries...."
9. Aiken, ibid. p. 193
10. Spain's colonial documents from 1821. The New Chech Republic information. CK.
11. Aiken, ibid. p. 296
12. Chaitkin, ibid. "Chapter Thirteen, From British East India Company to Emerson, Carlyle and Marx". pp. 263-304.
13. ibid. pp. 302-303. Chaitkin quotes from Karl Marx draft of critque of List's National System in Marx and Engels, Collected Works, Vol IV 4, pp.267-268.
14. The original Declaration of Independence of the the American Colonies, 1775.
15. Commager, Henry Steele, "Documents of American History". 1963. #127 pp. 235-237, The Monroe Doctrine, Extracts from President Monroes Seventh Annual Message to Congress, December 12, 1823. Meridith Publishing Company, NY
16. Ibid.
17. Ibid.
18. A Very Thin Line, and link to GWU's National Archives to CIA docs. CK
19. 128.164.127.251/~ccps/etzioni/general2.html.
20. Paine, Thomas, "The Rights of Man", 1791
21. Ibid.
22. Mitchell, Margaret, "Gone With the Wind". date? pp.? CK
23. Chaitkin, ibid.
24. Alexandar Hamilton, Federalist Papers. CK
25. Chaitkin, ibid.
26. Ibid.
27. Ibid.
28. Ibid. p. ?
29. Aiken, ibid. p. 201
30. Commager, ibid, Alien and Sedition Act of 1798. p.? CK
31. War of 1812 CK
32. Burke, Edmund, "Reflections of the Revolution in France", Edited by H.D. Mahoney, originally published 1790, reprinted by Macmillian Publishing Co. 1955. Mahoney explains how "in light of the later {above book), it may thus be seen that Burke was a life- long opponent of any system based upon reason alone. If the critisism of the rationalists should go unopposed, there was a grave danger that the existing social order would be destroyed." p. ix. Mahoney quotes Burke explaining the future of No-Reason, "... it is reconciled in politics: and politics ought to be adjusted not to human reasonings but to human nature; of which reason is but a part, and by no means the greatest part." p xiii.
33. Keir, Sir David Lindsay, "The Constitutional History of Modern Britain Since 1485", 1966, W.W. Norton & Co. Inc. NY First published in 1938. On p. v, Sir Keir explains why revisions to the book are necessary, "When, as at the moment, a tendency arises to refer to the social sciences instead of to history for the answers to the problems of government, it is worth remembering that parlimentary democracy on the lines it assumed here a hundred years ago has thus far overcome the assaults of all its enemies and still offers the supreme example of success in the 'endless adventure of governing men'."
34. Stone, Irving, The Origin, A Biographical Novel of Charles Darwin, 1980, Doubelday & Company, NY. pp.9- 289.
35. Darwin, Charles, list his books. CK
36. See: umich.edu/~bhl/topics/eugenics.htm, "Eugenics, the genetic engineering of the early twentieth century, rolled like a wave out of Great Britain on the strength of the work of Galton, Davenport and Love... John Kellog hosted Race Betterment Conferences in 1914, 1915, and 1928." See also: nucleus.cshl.org/CSHLlib/archives/ciwscope.htm, this is the Carngie Institute of Washington's eugenic's archives. See also the modern day mission statement for Future Generations @ eugenics.net/papers/mission.html. For a well- researched American Christian viewpoint, see: watch.pair.com/charter.html. pp.3 -6.
37. See: citizenreviewonline.org/may_2002/UN_agenda_21.htm. For a full report on the Plan, see: ecouncil.ac.cr/rio/focus/report/english/la21_rep.htm. Contact: Paul Markovitz, Program Director, Institute for Sustainable Communities, email: ISC@iscvt.org.
38. The official definition for sustainable development in the Bruntland Report, 1987, is: "development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs." See: iclei.org/us/communties21.html. A MUST read for all Americans: Guide for Civil Society Organizations for the Implementation of the Habitat Agenda, Final Draft February 1998, online at: unchs.org/english/hagaenda/civil-so.htm. This UN organiazation promotes: "political and legisaltive means that will allow organizations of the civil society to influence national programmes to implement the Habitat Agenda."
39. Forman, James D., "Communism: From Marx's Manifesto to 20th Century Reality", 1972. pp. 17-21, Dell Publishing Co. NY.
40. Ibid. #36 above
41. Aiken, ibid. p. 192. Aiken generously supplies the term: "It must also be pointed out that Marx's materialistic philosophy cannot properly be thought to involve an egoistic theory of human nature. Marx is an environmentalist." (italics mine)
42. See: citizenreviewonline.org/sustainable.htm. Editor Sue Ford has compiled a well- rounded list of links to official and rebuttal information about sustainable development. See also Dave Forman's history with Earthfirst @ ?CK. For one of the best American anti-UN sites covering the UN-SD program, go to: womensgroup.org/PCSD497.html.
43. Ibid. Local Agenda 21's stated goal: "By 1996, every local authority should have consulted its citizens and developed a Local Agenda 21 for the community." See: gdrc.org/uem/uem/la21/la21.html.
44. For example: Seattle, WA Enterprise Community's Strategic Plan Summary, pp.1-4, hud.gov/cpd/ezec/wa/waseatt1.html. ibid. #42 above.
45. Ibid.
46. Can the White House Help Catalyze Citizen Renewal? A proposal for a Civic Partnership Council, 1994. cpn.org/sections/new_citizenship/civic_part_council.html
47. Ibid.
48. "The Third Way, Summary of the NEXUS online discussion", edited by David Halpern with David Miskosz. netnexus.org/library/papers/3way.html., May 1998. Participants included: Michael Jacobs, General Secretary of the Fabian Society. See also: watch.pair.com/thirdway.html for an opposition, American Christian perspective.
49. Fabian Society, address. CK
50. Ibid. link to H.G. Wells. CK
51. Ibid. CK
52. Ibid. CK
53. Remarks at the White House Conference on Character Building for a Civil and Democratic Society, May 20, 1995. From 1996 Presidential Documents Online. See: frwais.access.gpo.gov. [DOCID:pd29my95_txt5]
54. Allen, Mike, Washington Post Staff Writer, "Bush Plans Values-Based Initiative to Rev Up Agenda". July 29, 2001. CK website link.
55. Fabian link to Clinton's speech. CK
56. Tarpley, Webster and Chaitkin, Anton, "The Unauthorized Biography of George W. Bush", CK date and weblink.
57. Links to Rupperts website, CK, also to New American Century.
58. Zacaria, Janine, Internet Jerusulem Post, Nov 9, 2002, "Jewish law institute launched in DC". The 3 US Supreme Court Justices in attendance at the kosher launch dinner were: Ruth Bader Ginsberg, Stephen Breyer, and Antonin Scalia. Janine doesn't clarify which Talmud the new institute will be using (is it a Babylonian Talmud or Jerulselem Talmud?) The institute, "..will also promote the teaching of Jewish law, develop curricula on Jewish law that can be integrated into tradtional law school courses..."
59. For the best online research, posts and detailed discussions regarding the Zionist participation in the creation of the New World Order, read what Australian Peter Myers has at his site. users.cyberone.com.au/myers. For an American history of the Khazar "Jews' and how they created a stronghold in Russia and the US, see ibid. # 7a above.
60. Commager, ibid. President Washington's Farewell Address, p. CK
61. Ibid.
62. Definition of social justice, CK
63. Ibid.
64. the dialectic CK
65. Define Modus Pones, Websters. CK
66. Aiken, ibid. p. 26.
67. The Fabian Society, ibid.
68. The Faith-Based Initiative. See: hud.gov/cdc/cfm. Faith based and community organizations is part of President Bush's Rallying the Armies of Compassion, Executive Order, January 29, 2001. The Seattle Times ran a story on p. A-4, December 12, 2002 under the Headlines: Bush plans rule change to aid religious charities; Order would bypass Congress on issue.
69. Etzioni, Amitai, National Rifle Association, Communitarianism and the Law Review, CK. Etzioni's platform says: "We join with those who read the Second amendment the way it was written, with a communitarian clause, calling for community militias not individual gun-slingers." See: communitariannetwork.org/platformtext.htm
70. The Defense Agency's Research Projects Agenda, See: if.afrl.mil/programs/edcs/
71. Markoff, John, New York Times, November 9, 2002, "Pentagon Plans a Computer That Would Peek at Personal Data of Americans".
72. Ruppert, ibid.
73. find info on Hamiliton's arguments... CK
74. Center for Conspiracy Culture, wkac.ac.uk/ccc/content/otheress.html has many essays on "conspiracy culture." Other "experts" on the "culture" include: floodlight.org where Gerry Rough teaches us "The Rise of the Modern Conspiracy Theory Movement". Their content page explains: "In July 1997 the supplement to the Oxford English Dictionary included the term 'conspiracy theory' for the first time. This was a recognition that in recent years conspiracy has become increasingly popular as an explanation of unfolding events, most overtly in the United States." It explains on p. 4, "..the conspiracy viewpoint which has become most the most prevalent and established in the USA in the past five years and associated with patriot groups and militias is that of the so-called New World Order, with its elaborate discourse of United Nations dominance. (emphasis mine) And here's an American "skeptic," Tim Callahans' work is at: skeptic.com.
75. Ibid
76. "Clinton and the Promise of Communitarianism", Reinventing Citizenship Project,
Unauthorized Biography of George W. Bush, New Democratic Leadership Council, New American Century: newamericancentury.org/statementofprinciples.htm, etc ad nauseum.
77. Ibid.
78. This author has hard copies of several early drafts of the Seattle Revised Noise Ordinance, and was also a participant in the Citizen's Review Meeting on June, 6, 2000. Seattle police and the Department of Justice created a "citizen action team" to help design "new legislation" under the New Neighborhood Local Agenda 21 Plans. This author was barred from attending further meetings because she asked for the definition of "noise."
79. This author has a series of correspondence with all Seattle government officials in charge of "implementing the neighborhood plans" throughout late 1999 and early 2000. After this author found the WA St. Public Disclosure Law, she began to get responses to her requests for paperwork used in the "new enforcement procedures" identified at IC-L-13 and 14 in both the March 1999 draft and in the legally adopted Roosevelt Neighborhood Plan Adoption And Approval Matrix, July, 1999. This author has several letters from every agency "in the partnership," and while many ignored ALL requests for definitions, the Department of Neighborhoods admitted having NO definitions to "noise, " rooming houses," or "life-threatening." (ALL of these new COPS terms were used in the enforcement program)
80. Ibid. citizenreviewonline.org CK
81. freedomdrive.org CK
82. Ibid.
83. Vanity Fair.. CK.. hardcopy in house?
84. Ibid. NY Times
85. Homeland Security Office.. link. Americorps, link. Urban Warfare School link. Itelligence Resource Program link to Mossad: tas.org/irp/world/israel/mossad/index.html. And, go see what this author considers to be another possible, scary, and very strange "link" to Etzioni: larouchepub.com/other/2001/2833mega_spy.html (Is Etzioni Mega?) Also.. confirm??? Mossad's asking Bush for an "office" in U.S. Homeland Security??????
86. newsreport of CIA assignments to FBI.. hardcopy.. find. COPS links.
87. HUD and COPS and W&S program links.
88. NATS-DON-COMPASS links.
89. LINK to HS ACT.
90. Ibid.
91. Total Information Awareness's logo is a masonic symbol. See ACLU's dumb warning letter at: LINK, post my piece, "The Darpa Dilemma."