http://nord.twu.net/acl/cafta.html The Anti-Communitarian League (ACL)
Grassroots Research & Analysis of the Ultimate Third Way
[ HOME ] -- [ Research ] -- [ Contact ]
CAFTA, the EU & Communitarian Law
by Niki Raapana Anti-Communitarian League (ACL)
Anchorage, Alaska, January 15, 2006
After wading through all the publications and websites representing both support and opposition for the Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-approved by the U.S. Congress July 2005), it's astonishing to realize how very few of them bother to explain the legal foundation for the agreement. CAFTA, like most international trade agreements, is based entirely in the supremecy of communitarian law.
The European Union is based entirely in the supremecy of communitarian law. The European Commission established a Communitarian Court of Justice. The United Nations is also based entirely in the supremecy of communitarian law. Communitarian law supports the mandates for sustainable growth principles established in UN Local Agenda 21. Besides the communitarian supremecy of CAFTA and in other proposals for a North American Free Trade Agreement, there are also plans to create a communitarian code of justice for the Middle East.
Supreme global law is also called Community Law, community aquis, and aquis communitaire. Supreme law requires each member state to modify their national constitutions to accomodate communitarian principles. Communitarianism puts the rights of the community over the rights of the individuals living in the community. Communitarian law integrates nations into the global communitarian justice system. The term "community," when used by global communitarians, can define everything from smallest rural area to the entire region, as in the "European Community." Today the EU Communitarian Court is used as the model for all regional trade agreements in the works.
While communitarian law is without a doubt the most important legal topic in the world, American experts on both "sides" of the free trade arguments completely ignore it. Consequently, it's the rare American who has any concept of how prevalent or powerful this new system of justice is. Universities in England, Spain, Portugul, and Romania offer coursework and masters programs in Communitarian Law. Only a few elite American universities offer courses in communitarian law, and barely a handful of American students have ever studied it.
How is it possible that Americans, with their "free press" and literate population are completely unfamiliar with the term communitarian law? The problem appears to be a constitutional issue over the definition of treason. Communitarian law is designed to over-rule all national law, including the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. For some unknown reason (which this author won't even try to guess), Americans flat out refuse to consider the possibility that current events resulting in federal legislation and Exectutive Orders that balance individual rights against "saftey" (as do the Patriot Act and the Homeland Security Act) may be part of an international plot to take control of the world.
The American people don't believe there are any more Hitlers or Stalins. They believe communism "died" in the eighties, and that former evil colonial rulers all spiritually evolved into nice, kind "helpers." This amazing under-education promotes such a naive approach to modern politics that admitting the unknown is almost impossible for them. Indeed, many prefer to "shoot the messenger" rather than admit they somehow missed the most important legal development of the 20th century. The fact is, communitarian law and philosophy are so well hidden from the American people that many have accused this author of making the terms up as a part of my own personal "conspiracy theory."
European voters, on the other hand, are much more familiar with the terms of the new agreements. Dutch and French voters rejected the European Constitution because of its basis in the supremecy of communitarian law. With a rare openness regarding the controversy, James Kanter reported in the International Herald Tribune on Sunday, January 1, 2006 that, "There are some tendencies within the European Union that can be seen with critical eyes," he said, notably "an extension of communitarian law by the European court." ( From Austria, 'new thoughts' for EU)
That's a pretty strong citation, but how can this possibly be true? This is a big a revelation. It's much too important to come from a nobody. Something so fantastic would never be left to the small-time, rank-and-file, American wanna-be journalist. This is a New York Times or a Washington Post Story. Who the hell is the ACL? We know. We have no credentials, none, what-so-ever. That makes us a thoroughly discredited source. If this article were factual and verifiable, obviously, somebody much more credible would have broke the story a long time ago. But they didn't, did they? And now, once you verify our sources and confirm the existance of communitarian law, you've got to ask yourself the only thing that matters anymore. Why? Why didn't your schools or your elected officials publically explain U.S. intergration into a communitarian juridical system? The U.S. has been integrating communitarian legal principles for several decades, and what's obvious to us is the last thing the plotters want is for you to identify how they're doing it.
Communitarian Community based Development is the structure for implementing the new system of law. Bush called it Re-Building Community when he explained the new War on Terror in February 2002, and he wasn't kidding. The idea for re-building every community in the world under the control of a powerful community government is well underway in every nation. It's being violently exported to Afghanistan, Palestine, Iraq and discussions are well underway to take it to the entire Middle East. It's being quietly adopted by local stakeholder councils across the U.S. From Mexico to Peru, from Serbia to Malaysia, from the Phillipines to Russia, from China to the UK and the EU, all are in the process of subordinating national law under regional communitarian authority. No place in the entire world has been left behind.
Community Development agencies and Community Policing is in every American community. Many towns have a whole lot more COPS on the beat now. The new cops prevent crime before it happens and their new job includes helping rebuild livable communities. This is why new COPS walk right in people's private homes all the time without knocking or wasting time getting a legal search warrant. Modern cops are part of action teams who write innovative communitarian laws. Modern COPS can require our citizens show ID (Hiibel v. State of Nevadea). Communitarian COPS visit nosey neighbors and gather "anecdotal information" that may indicate who's a "problem." In the U.S., former KGB spies and Mossad assassins train communitarian COPS to use high-tech technology. Some COPS are military snipers. All cops wear bullet proof vests all the time now. New COPS have fifty nifty new gadgets hanging all over their uniforms. And, in a major shift in American public policy regulations, communitarian COPS sit on "citizen" committees who rewrite local zoning regulations to incorporate communitarian laws. The COPS help suggest the problems. Then they suggest new ways to get around the individual rights of the problem people, rights which are too strongly guaranteed by a binding legal contract called the U.S. Constitution. They write the exact same laws in every community in America to address the exact same locally identified, citizen suggested problems. They call it holistic, local, grass roots, "participatory democracy" in action.
COPS are trained to stalk and patrol targeted neighborhoods. More and more neighborhoods in the U.S. are ghost towns at night. It's creepy to drive through neighborhoods where the only cars are cops who play cat and mouse games. COPS keep computer logs of patrons at local watering hubs, and the statistics on Americans who've been arrested by them for DUIs is astounding. Our President has openly admitted to have ordered illegal surveillance on private citizens. This is communitarian "law" in action. Communitarian data-gathering requirements are now part of every state driver's licensing agency. Our private information is being cross-referenced with data gathered from our family members, work associates, and our friendly, patriotic neighbors. Our private communications, via phone and our personal and work computers, on and off the internet, are all being monitored in the name of community security.
Legal permission for the new laws from the locally elected officials to rebuild the sustainable communities is almost always granted. It's the rare Smarth Growth Plan in the United States that wasn't unanimously passed by states, counties and municipalities. Communitarian environmental law was the first major breakthrough back in the 1970s and by the 90s every state in the U.S. had jumpedon the bandwagon. The European Commission tells us their Communitarian Court of Justice established communitarian evironmental case law precendent since 1957. Communitarian environmental laws are supreme to any national law or individual right that conflicts with the collective rights of the member states included in supranational organizations. Regional justice centers have replaced City Halls and County Courts. Administrative Hearing and Review Boards replaced constitutional courts altogether. (Try to use the Bill of Rights to get your driver's license back from the DMV.)Revised zoning violations and public nuisance abatements are used by government and NGO partners to assume control over private land. Eminent domain has been expanded to include "best use" policies. All American cities, towns, and rural areas have the exact same new Community Development agencies. The new community agencies enforce all the exact same new communitarian laws.
United Nations Local Agenda 21 was adopted the same year Clinton took office. The U.N. sponsored Bruntland Commission defined the new way to explain the principles of a communitarian system; communitarian law came to be defined as "sustainable development." It mimicked Marxism's motto of "each according to their need, each according to their ability." UN Sustainable Development means to protect all resources for future generations and make everyone in the present quit making anything useful or productive that comes out of the earth. The whole theory is based on the idea that humans kill the planet by using its resources. Communitarians promote a thing called human rights, a theory of justice which is totally the opposite of individual rights. Individual rights are what the U.S. Bill of Rights was established to protect. Human Rights covers every aspect of human suffering and death. Unlike clear laws that protect individual liberty, Human Rights can only be enforced by a supreme global communitarian legal system. What Americans really don't understand is that ultimately, Human Rights includes the Marxist mandates for confiscation and "equal" distribution of private property and goods. In the logic of the globalists, individual rights to protect yourself, your property, and the freedom to choose ones' own life path, are ancient, outdated barriers to global peace and justice. Does it matter to Americans (or Iraqis) if individual rights have all being criminalized under communitarian laws?
http://nord.twu.net/acl/cafta.html