Drastic changes to government are underway across the globe.
By the year 2020, we will all be governed by a new system of law.

http://nord.twu.net/acl/religion.html
The Anti-Communitarian League (ACL)
Grassroots Research & Analysis of the Ultimate Third Way
[ HOME ] -- [ Research ] -- [ Contact ]

2020 exposes our fascist future.
We've all been conned.
Want to know how?
Here's the unbelievable truth:
Nobody can dispute us!

The Role of Religion in the Communitarian Synthesis

by Niki Raapana, September 11, 2006

This page is under construction. Please email any comments you'd like to share.

2 new updates 12/02/06:
1. Check out this flagrant rewrite of American history at http://churchstatehistory.net/:"Seventeenth-century Colonial Americans generally shared a Protestant Christian worldview and embraced a communitarian ethic rooted in a regional homogeneity of belief and acceptable forms of behavior. During the 1700s, this seventeenth-century worldview and the communitarian societies it spawned both came under attack from Enlightenment understandings of the nature of man, which gave rise to a prioritization of the rights of individuals over the interests of the community. The American Revolution, rooted in perceptions of man as reasonable, rational, and possessed of an innate moral sense, reconceived of society as a realm in which free political and economic actors could pursue their own goals, passions, and desires limited only by a respect for the equal rights of others to engage in similar pursuits."

2. Is the Conflict of Civilizations Unavoidable? by Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev, A speech by the Representative of the Russian Orthodox Church to the European Institutions at the Seventh Dialogue between the Orthodox Church and Members of the European People's Party (Christian Democrats) and European Democrats (Istanbul, October 17, 2003).

As my articles move deeper into the religious roots for the coming synthesis, I am already getting emails that question my religious belief. I've decided it's a valid question, as I could easily be a phony front for a blatant Luciferian-Satanic "light" worshipping organization (like 1000 Points of Light).

The ACL does not promote any religion or spiritual belief. We believe in a Creator. We honor the Three Levels of Law embraced by the American colonials: #1-God's law; #2- Natural law; #3- man's law. The U.S. Constitution allows for no established state religion. Our system was created by men with a shared belief in a supreme Creator who endowed all men with certain unalienable rights. Our government's only legitimate purpose is to secure those rights for posterity.

Each new page of the ACL website was originally created to explore specific topics that directly relate to the communitarian synthesis. In 2003 I still naively thought there would be an "end" to the ACL research, a final conclusion, or something close to it. It took several more years of study to fully comprehend the fact that communitarians balanced all religious, political and legal beliefs to fit into the communitarian solution. In order for me to fully understand my new communitarian global government, it became necessary that I attempted to place each theory and religion where it belongs in the communitarian vision for the future.

From the beginning, I tried to keep my personal spiritual beliefs out of my anti-communitarian argument. This was probably not the wisest decision, since Hegel's whole theory (which is the basis for communitarianism) included the idea of humanity "achieving spirit," collectively. Dialectical philosophy maintains the emerging communitarian synthesis is the ultimate acheivement of mankind. Social evolutionary principles encourage pre-planned and managed changes at all levels of societies. It's forced evolution.

Our main objection to communitarianism is that it modifies U.S. Law under supreme Communitarian Law, and they didn't bother to tell Americans the truth about it. Another objection we have is that communitarianism requires a watering down of all strongly held religious values that conflict with Marxist athestic principles.

Early in the formation of this website, my daughter Nordica (the ACL co-founder) stepped in and took over. She went to work organizing the growing number of articles I had begun writing for the site. She redesigned the whole thing. Then she compiled a long list of topics relative to communitarianism. She told me the only way the ACL research would ever make sense was if I filled in all the blanks. I couldn't believe she thought that after already wasting three years working on the Plans and the Dawson v. The City of Seattle lawsuits that I needed to study so many more intense topics. That's when I first came to terms with Nordica's understanding of the complex history of America, the world, it's religions, and it's religious laws.

The theory of Communitarianism has it's own Law, it's own guru, its own theoretical basis, and another set of laws based in the Talmud, which is being taught to American lawyers and judges at the Judaic Law Institute in Washington D.C.. Communitarian and Talmudic Law supercedes all other national and religious laws.

This means studying communitarianism requires studying just about everything, including Marxist economics, Wilsonian politics, international banking and finances, all the religions (including the creepiest ones), psychology (including mind-control), anthropology (including eugenics and genocide), game theory, chaos theory, Marxist social justice theory, and just in case that's not enough, let's throw in the alien theory, hidden freemasonry, alchemy, and the Kabbalah for a really confusing "good time."

The communitarian plan is peppered with religious and fraternal organizations I knew nothing about. We also found ourselves faced with several emotional dilemmas.

I had no idea that my research into communitarianism would lead me to study the history of Zionist Israel and the role of the British and the U.S. government in the proposal to create a Jewish national state in Palestine. I intially refused to even read The Protocols of the Elders of Zion and I rejected all the research that mentioned anything less than glorious about Jews. I still won't cite the Protocols as genuine. In spite of some world-class scholarship that disagrees with me and irregardless of the accurate predictions made by the author of Protocols about the 21st century programs and laws (particularly the part about community policing), I still think it was written and leaked by communitarians as a Hegelian device to promote violent anti-Semitism which would help to eliminate European Jewish reluctance to Palestinan immigration. It's also become a highly successful tool used to discredit exposes that get too close to the truth). But we did include the 1887 World Zionist Congress and the 1917 Balfour Declaration in our thesis; nobody disputes these as fakes.

Popular American Jewish support for creating a Zionist state did not exist until after the first Zionist Supreme Court Justice was appointed by President Woodrow Wilson, "against bittter opposition within Congress and without" (Cantor 1991). American Jews sent money and visited, but few wished to settle in Palestine. Unlike the U.S., Israel is not an independent free republic with all the legal power vested in the people. The Israeli Revolutionary Army was assisted by the Soviet Army, not the U.S. Army. Even though U.S. taxpayers send a third of their foreign aid to the tiny nation, the Israeli "democratic" system remains most favorable to immigrants who are card carrying communist Jews of European descent. The Arab and African Jews are lowest on the Israeli democratic totem pole. A sizeable migration of European Jews into Palestine was not accomplished until after the Nazis had thoroughly terrorized all the Jews of Europe. (Hitler's popularity with the German people in the 1930s was a direct result of the economic conditions of the peace treaty designed by the Wilsonian international elites after WWI.) To me, the International Jew that Henry Ford wrote about is just another segment of the multi-faceted and vast international cartel that promotes the elitist communitarian synthesis. It is my personal opinion that it is a mistake to assume the plan for a supra-national world government rests solely on the hands of any one race or religious order. I'm convinced the poorest Jewish settlers and the poorest Palestinian people are all being used to further the ultimate internationalist goal in much the same way as all communitarian war victims are.

No matter how much I wanted to, I couldn't deny the U.S. Supreme Court is using the Talmud to balance U.S. law into a more Judaic interpretation. So I did some intial digging around and believe me, the Talmud is not the Judaic Old Testament. It was never a secret that the founder of American Communitarian "thinking" studied the Kabbalah, he shares that openly, so I had to know what that was too. The Kabbalah is easily classified as an "occult" practice, which most definitely places it outside the Judeo-Christian Biblical traditions. Then I learned about the Sabbateans from Barry Chamish (an Israeli Jewish investigative political journalist whose patriotism didn't stop him from taking the time to explain the violence of Israeli politics and the teachings of certain Rabbis to me).

There's also a little-known Sanhendrin Court in Jerusalem now. It's coming to the U.S. to enforce something called the Seven Noahide Laws against non-Jews. When I realized there are actually U.S. Congessional Acts that establish days and honors for The Seven Laws of Noah and Gaia-Mother Earth, I decided to brave the accusations of anti-Semitism (which barely came, eventually our Talmudic Law page began to be linked to from Judaic studies' programs). Regardless of the uncomfortableness this subject causes to many ACL visitors, I will continue to study the Zionist's influence on the synthesis, just as I will continue to study every other religious component to the plan.

Boy, was I was shocked when I found the Catholic Pope and his priests penning the first writings I saw that explicitly defined political communitarianism as the synthesis in the Hegelian-Marxist dialectic. It was a big ol' boost to find such credible validation for our thesis, but the personal downside was it forced me into a disturbing reality check. My sweet, overeducated, most beloved (and painfully missed) son has been in a Catholic private school for ten years. His Finnish-Irish-American Catholic father promised to provide him with the best schools if I allowed him full custody. I hoped the opportunity for a "normal childhood" and a first rate education would someday make up for my moving Nordica "outside" and my ex's frequent out-of-town work. I wanted to believe my son was getting a better life than I could offer him. I know he's glad he doesn't have to suffer in my poverty the way Nordica did. I also know the nuns told him I was a bad mother. But, believe me, the last thing I ever wanted to do was look closely at the communitarian teachings of the Catholic Church. As if what I already know isn't bad enough, just recently I got an email with links to the history of Distributivism (which is communitarianism). I almost wished I hadn't seen this part. There remains a childish part of me that wishes I didn't know any of this.

Then I found the World Council of Churches and Protestant support for communitarian Zionism.

While much of the American populace continues to scoff at the idea of an emerging global government that has supreme authority over Americans, the American Christian community has many members who believe there is a transformation. I place the works produced by Joan Veon, Charlotte Iserbyt, Peter Goodgame and many other Christian women and men in the ACL's highest and most reliable source category. I'm not talking about my faith in their ability to tell the truth; it's the fact that all their primary information was verifiable through government websites, academic papers and other published documents.

Only a few Christian ministers (like Berit Kjos) identify the emerging system for their congregation as communitarianism. (I have no idea what's being taught in synagogues and mosques.) Many mainstream churches chose instead to accept the conditions in the Communitarian's Faith-Based agenda. Funding is pouring down from D.C. like manna from Heaven. There's not much incentive out there to tell your constituents or your congregation the truth about the source and the goal of communitarian programs. Even if they know communitarianism will destroy America (which most probably don't, not really), nobody wants to bite the hand that feeds them.

The communitarian synthesis includes a small, medium, or large portion of almost every idea, religion, and social theory that ever existed. It does not include the original American's freedom of religion, political economics, rights to property and privacy, or due process under the law. Individual liberty and justice, the foundation for American law, has been eliminated for the good of "society as a whole." None of the American political parties will acknowledge what's happening, although a couple individual representatives (like U.S. Congressman Ron Paul) have been writing about it, speaking about it, and voting against it for years.

Not only was this "wrenching" transformation to global communitarian-communism predicted in the Bible, but many in the Christian community believe in the inevitablity of the final conflict between God and Satan. They see this as the big war for our souls. So do the Communitarians, and they work for the "light" side. I think America's best hope for countering a completed communitarian coup in the USA by the year 2020 will come from Americanized, educated, religious Jewish, Christian, and Muslim voters.

Early American colonials were members of many different sects of Christianity, some of which were financially and socially attatched to the toppled elitist rulers. Nobody wanted to have to tithe or attend state church services on pain of arrest. Nobody wanted to endure inquisitions from the state church about their personal faith. U.S. law guaranteed each individual citizen's right to choose their own religious path, as long as it did not infringe on the indiviudual liberty of other citizens to choose theirs. When Americans felt cloistered by an overbearing religious leadership, they were free to move on to an area more to their liking. Often the the same conditions for one man leaving drew migrants of like minded religious people to fill his vacant spot. Americans were never famous for tolerating intolerable situations. It appears to me that optional American religious participation has been a success and may have contributed to religious leaders and their congregations learning to co-exist in relative peace and harmony with other religions since the beginning of America. It was very interesting to learn the Muslim-Arab countries used to be our country's best friends.

Make no mistake about the purpose of "rebuilding community." President Bush identified this as the number two purpose for the War on Terror. Starting in the Middle East, Muslims and Western Christians are being led in a London-D.C.-Tel Aviv-Arab-Hegelian war between "opposites." In the final solution, ancient religious rules for living that forbid certain activities will be replaced with mandatory "tolerance" for diverse religious rituals, practices, and lifestyles. Every religious group that refuses to bend and blend is under attack from the global elites. The surviving masses of faithful Christians, Jews, and Muslims (after the dialectical wars kill off the majority) must all be retrained to worship in "the Light." I am as opposed to forcing people to change religions as I am to forcing them to worship communitarian gods.

We love many different people who practice different religions, but I admit I feel helpless around suffering people whose religion doesn't include a loving, just, forgiving and all powerful Creator. Even though the New World Religion is based a lot in pagan beliefs and Earth worship, I don't bear any personal hostility to the poor, searching, and troubled people I know who believe in all kinds of things. I am absolutely hostile to a world government forcing me to attend pagan communitarian cermonies or holidays.

The very fact that communitarianism includes a mixture of mysticism and Satanic worship makes my skin crawl. I am repulsed by "Satan/light/becoming like God" worship. It was so horrible when Nordica uncovered the Luciferian-theosophy followers of Madame Blavatsky and we saw their extended influence on American communitarian politics via Annie Bessant and the London Fabian Society. It was disgusting having to read mainstream news accounts about the elite's perversions from Belgium to Hollywood to the White House. I wept at all the emerging personal accounts of child sexual and ritual abuse, some alledgedly at the hands of prominent American officials. When Hunter S. Thompson committed suicide right after a boy told his story about a child sexual murder at Bohemian Grove, and alleged that Thompson had filmed it, my outraged child wanted me to include a topic page that addressed these "light" beings' activities. She argued for even just the accredited news accounts, but I couldn't do it. It made me gag. It's the sick stuff.. and we still think it's why there are so many missing children in the U.S.

(I did eventually link to articles about the alledged child pornography/alien stories on the Conspiracy Theories page, which struck a chord with the opinion William Cooper had about the little "grey" people before he died. Cooper (an American Christian) was famous for writing Behold A Pale Horse, but I found a later article by him that questioned the whole alien aspect of his work. I found other people who think that chilren are dressed up as aliens and taken to parties where everyone is given acid and then compromised by the "aliens." The stories about the male prostitute in the White House press corps led us to the Bohemian Grove story. That led us to the bust in Europe of the child sex slave ring... and on and on it went. And unlike the alien theories we found, child slavery rings are in the "real news." Who buys these kids? For what?)

We can appreciate and live by the Judaic-Christian religious foundations that formed our American society, but we can't appreciate modifications that include ancient Judaic legal texts, other than the ones used in the Old Testament of the Holy Bible. I thought everyone agreed the Ten Commandments were the role model for the American people's attempt to behave in a civilized manner. I don't know anyone who would agree the Talmud is the basis for American jurisprudence. I was shocked at first by the ACLU challenging a judge for hanging a copy of the Ten Commandments in the lobby of an American court of law. Then I studied the ACLU. It's weird to think the kids don't say God anymore in the Pledge of Alliegiance. I always knew we were "one nation, under God," because our founders said we are all endowed by our Creator. (Plus my dad ended every toast with, "God, country, and the 82nd Airborne!." If God wasn't #1 here, my dad would never has said His name first.)

American history Professor Norman Cantor explains Wilson and Brandeis's long-range plans for a international communitarian synthesis in "Inventing the Middle Ages" as "... the Wilsonian vision that America's future lay in the hands of a university-trained bureaucratic elite has not been superceded. The emerging supra-national world order is a completely reinvented system of top-down, imperial government with a vast bureaucracy already in place across the globe. The system is huge and it will control every minute detail of human life. It's a centralized, corporate, statist system based in the dialectical arguments between hard right Marxists and soft left Marxists. (The communitarian dialecticians never argue with American Christians who won't speak in useless, dialectical circles. A good early example of this is found in speeches by General Douglas MacArthur after he was removed from his Korean War command.)

This is the essense of Dr. Amitai Etzioni's brand of sociology, or what him and his buddy Gorbachev re-named, "socio-economics." Keep in mind that all the modern academic texts for these topics were written by dialectically trained elite scholars. Every low-level school in the USA only teaches its students the communitarian party line (and requires communitarian-community service work). The enormous conglomerate of communitarian "ideas" has already permeated every area of American life.

Besides Israel (which has religious law and a Marxist economy, meaning the U.S. taxpayers support it), the last national hold-outs against the transformation to a communitarian world order are the ones whose surviving political systems are based in religion. This includes Ireland (for all it's strife, the Sinn Fein understood American economics), and the predominantly Islamic nations in the Middle East, Africa, and Indonesia. Greece is almost entirely Greek Orthodox but we have to wonder if they didn't hold out against the EU only because they were never told the goal of EU communtarian law Like Israel, England, France and Cuba, many other nations are imperialist or Marxist, or as with the U.S., China, and Russia they are already a communitarian blend that is fashionably called "market socialism."

Please understand, I am not a practicing Christian anymore. My heart tells me to honor all people who seek a just and loving Creator to base man's laws upon. It irks me to tears that I am by default placed into the middle, communitarian categorization. Raised on teachings in the Holy Bible, I tried to live the way I was taught Jesus wants me to live. It was really nice to find out that Islamic teachings support my desire to become "skilled in the art of kindness." I always loved being in prayer circles with Maynard, a ceremonial pipe carrier of the Lakota tradition. I believe that when Jesus said "Wherever two or more are gathered in my name, there I will be also," that He meant that every minor, insignificant meeting between two or more human beings can be a prayer meeting if one of us invites God in. I never came close to living up to my highest ideals or expectations, but at 50 I can say I've become a kinder, more thoughtful and forgiving person as a direct result of my prayers for help in these areas. I readily admit I am an imperfect sinner, that only through the grace of God I am alive today, and I do believe that on my own I would be lost. Much of my ACL research has been a real test of my character and strength. I like to believe that God is what's holding me up. I sincerely hope that when I die I will be forgiven for all my tresspasses, as I have tried (yet often failed) to forgive those who tresspass against me. God knows I indulged in many worldly temptations, and if I'm not forgiven only because I don't believe totally in the redemption power of Christ alone, so be it. I am the only one required to answer for my sin of non-belief, while I'm alive it can't possibly have a negative affect on anyone else. Beyond that, I cannot believe much of anything, not until I get to the bottom of this whole dialectical plan for "world peace and justice."

In addition to the published papers by Jewish and Catholic Communitarians who openly write about a communitarian synthesis, I have found many good private non-communitarian resources for understanding Jewish, Muslim, and Christian opposition to the emerging supra-national global government. Devoted religious oriented political researchers are among the many people I found who took the time to help me to understand the power and confusion of the religious global vision. I'm honored to have had personal contact with several of the below authors, a couple of whom today I consider to be very close friends. There exists a certain comraderie between people who have come face to face with the bitter truths about the plan. Everyone comes to this knowledge from their own individual perspective, and no two are alike.

Jeri Lynn Ball, American Christian anti-communitarian reseracher, author of The Great Communitarian Hoax
Barry Chamish, Israeli Jewish anti-CFR researcher, author of Who Murdered Yitzak Rabin?
Anton Chaitkin, American Jewish Larouche supporter, Historical Editor of EIR, author of Treason in America, from Aaron Burr to Averil Harriman
Bobby Garner @ Congregator.net, American Christian anti-communitarian researcher
Peter Goodgame, American Christian historical researcher, author of Return to Babylon
Harunyahya, Turkish Muslim historical freemasonry researcher, author
Berit Kjos, American Christian Minister, anti-communitarian researcher, author of Brave New Schools
Nancy Levant, American Christian anti-communitarian researcher, author of The Cultural Devastation of American Women
Henry Makow, Canadian Jewish child genius anti-NWO researcher and author
Peter Myers~ Neither Aryan nor Jew, Australian Jesuit trained Higher Tribalism researcher
Jackie Patru-Sweet Liberty, American Christian researcher, author, radio host, very sweet, author of the very controversial Jewish Persecution
Iqbal Siddiqui, Muslim academic
John Stormer, American Christian-Mormon, former FBI agent, author of The Naked Communist
Joan Veon~ The Women's Group, American Christian anti-NWO investigator, author of Prince Charles: A Sustainable Prince

With a prayer for all the innocent sacrifical victims who perished five years ago today. Ho.

And then there's all those "other" religions included in the synthesis.

In our work here we touch on many "taboo" subjects, not because we like the controversy and the headache but because comprehensive communitarian studies demands it. Freemasonry is another topic I tried to avoid. Freemasons practice ceremonies that include prayers to a Higher Power, but I'm still not sure what that Higher Power is and if it should be included in ACL research as a sect of an as yet unidentified existing religion, as a cult, as an independent religion that exists outside the influence of all the others, or what, exactly. Regardless of what it is, after my brief ventures into its history, I actually hope to someday verify or dismiss my little side theory that there were very significant and honorable historial contributions made by the early associations of American, French, and Prussian freemasons. (But that would require some serious archival work on the East Coast, France and Germany, and more time and money than I can devote to such "wild" pursuits.)

My main problem with freemasonry is similar to my religious research dilemma. I can't read their original documents. There are hundreds of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim sects, and many of them use their own, specialized texts written in Hebrew, Greek, Latin, and Arabic. (I don't read in any of those languages.) There are several different branches of masons and hundreds of other similar fraternal and religious societies. Most of the secret society's records are secret, so it doesn't matter what language they're written in, 'cause I'll never see them anyway. Just like nobody's ever gonna give me permission to explore the Vatican's archives.

It was well covered in the last election that both Bushes and Kerry belong to the same secret society at Yale University (Skull and Bones), and it may be argued that most voting Americans didn't care enough about it to allow it to affect how they voted. Or maybe they didn't know. For many Americans, the Fabian Society, the Council on Foreign Relations and the Project for a New American Century et. al. could just as easily be conspiracy theories of secret societies for as much as average Americans have been told about them. Many of the globalist communitarian meetings are entirely secret, the press is not allowed to report on them, and attendence is by invitation only. Even our best and most dedicated researchers can only speculate about the real doings at Bohemian Grove, the G-8, the Club of Rome, and the Bilderberg meetings, just as there has always been speculation about what happened to Adam Weishaupt's Illuminated freemasons who were forced into exile by the Bavarian government after 1776.

We decided that freemasonry is the most plausible tie between General George Washington, General von Steuben, and the Marquis de Laffayette. Open colonial rebellion against the Crown was punishable by death (as some signers of the Declaration of Independence were to experience). It only makes sense that the plot to seize control over the American colonies from the British Empire had to be hidden. It had to be dominated by men sworn to secrecy with some kind of oath of loyalty between them. I would love to study authentic hidden stories of the (necessarily) secret society whose members fought for and formed a huge worker's union against imperial free trade.

I still don't completely understand why the truth about American freemasonry in American history is forgotten and left unexplained to the average student. Why is the study of it so fiercely ridiculed and labeled as conspiracy theory? Almost all the Lodge websites I've found proudly list the American presidents who were freemasons. President McKinley visted Lodges everywhere he went, and he was shot in a specially built building that looks amazingly similar to his tomb, both built by freemasons. Masons built America, just look at their signatures on all the U.S. government buildings. Rome wasn't built in a day. Zionist Jews and Christians are building a new Jerusalem. Marxist-Communitarians are rebuilding the world. Bush says his War on Terror is rebuilding community.

The more I read, the more questions I had about it. Like, when American freemasonry changed from a craftman's guild into a secret society did it also become a religion? Why did the Catholic Pope outlaw its practice? What did the Bavarian government find written inside the Illuminatti's private correspondence? Why did the American government ban its practice in the 1830s just because of one ugly public incident involving a freemason? And wasn't it just too ironic that the newly formed Anti-Masonic Party split the opposition and helped elect a freemason (Andrew Jackson) as the next U.S. President?

We know from his letters that the American Free and Accepted Mason George Washington was not Illuminatti (and I assume this also means his freemason officers in the Revolutionary War were not either). But Washington was aware of and concerned about the Illuminatti's existence. (I also know Washington was a deeply spiritual man who prayed all night before he led his troops across the freezing Delaware. The most successful and daring act of bravery and faith in the revolutionary war was conceived in a prayer made by a freemason who believed in God. It was nothing short of a miracle that not one of his rag-tag Army of freezing, starving, and exhausted soldiers died in their early morning terrorist assault on the highly trained and professional Hessian army camp.)

The Alien and Sedition Act (the first act of the U.S. Congress) may have been passed to protect American government offices (which were likely dominated by masons and fraternal societies practicing nepotism) from foreign aristocrats, foreign bankers, Illuminatti and French Jacobin infiltrators. Today, although the institution of Scottish Rite of Freemasonry is an active contributor to the communitarian development of American "civil societies," awareness and concern about Illuminated freemasons is considered wacko paranoia. Washington was also concerned about "specious" changes to the constitution and he warned about it in his farewell address to the nation. Washington showed good instincts when he refused to serve with a soldier later charged with treasonous actions. Now who did he think was planning on making these "specious changes" to the newly formed constitutional government?

We are not racial supremecists, but we also have no illusions about how deep the supremacy belief runs in many cultures, besides how deep it runs with some Anglo whites. Normally I wouldn't even have an opinion if people want to live "sepratist" lives, because it's not my business and shouldn't affect me. Knowing the Amish, Quakers and hippie communalists lived separately never bothered me a bit. I understood why the Chinese wanted to live in Chinatown. But now I see too strong a parallel between racial supremicism and aristocratic elitism (which I call dialectical terrorism). Ruling classes always breed with each other no matter what race they're protecting. And, the "science" of eugenics was the attempt to justify racial "cleansing."

Insinctively, I defend "the individual protected by law can accomplish anything" theory. All my life I've believed that as we became more accomplished at the actual work involved in self-government and learned, as the first free people in history, how to enforce our people's laws, that we the people would eventually provide equal protection under the law to every citizen, regardless of their race, heritage, position, or wealth. My "spiritual vision" includes legal amends to every natural citizen in the U.S. who's been deprived of their unalienable rights, but I don't support any kind of "amnesty" for illigal immigrants, no matter where they came from originally.

I reject the purpose for the steady stream of open and illegal immigration. We love our Americanized friends from Korea, the Phillipines, Mexico, Asia, and Central and South America. We've met awesome people from all over the world actually, but besides the illegal flow over the southern borders, we know there is a new breed of "legal" immigrants who have been taught to hate Americans. Eastern Europeans who've lived their entire lives under Soviet communism are being relocated into small American, rural communities, and they're flaunting their disrespect and government subsidies in the faces of the American taxpayers who financed their whole move. (Even in remote places like Delta Junction, Alaska!) This open immigration policy is the perfect Hegelian set-up for a communitarian solution. The solution has already been designed, it's called the North American Union. The CAFTA merger is based in the supremacy of communitarian law, which means the U.S. already agreed to modify interal policies to conform to international communitarian standards.

Also, mass immigration played a key role in every major political upheaval in American history. Many first generation immigrants don't understand english or the original American system at all, and now fewer Americans understand it than ever before in the history of our republic. The bottom line is we cannot maintain a free republic that exists independently outside the supra-national order, not if our national decisions are based on blatant, ignorant disrepect for our own supreme laws. Confusion, conflict, and a dumb legal solution is the communitarian's standard operation; it doesn't work to maintain, protect, or defend U.S. freedom.

[ BACK TO TOP ]

copyright © 2001-2004, Niki Raapana and Nordica Friedrich (The Anti-Communitarian League)